quarta-feira, 30 de junho de 2010

água e carbono no planeta Terra

Hubert Reeves in Origins, Arcade Publishing, New York, 1998.

What makes our planet different from the others?

Our planet has plenty of water in liquid form. There's water elsewhere in the solar system, plenty of it. The satellites of Jupiter and of Saturn contain water in the form of ice, because of their very low temperatures. Recent measurements by the Galileo satellite suggest that liquid water may be present on the surface of Europa. Venus also has water in the form of vapor, because, being second closest to the Sun, Venus has extremely high temperatures. The Earth's orbit keeps us just far enough from the Sun to allow water to remain liquid.

Mars also used to have liquid water, as the so-called canals and dried-up wadis that spacecrafts have shown seem to indicate.

As recently confirmed by the Mars mission Pathfinder, torrents of water did flow on the surface of Mars some billion years ago. But for a long time now, there has been none. Why? We really don't know. Given its relatively small mass, its tectonic activity is now very weak.

But where does Earth's water come from?

Let's go back to those torrents of matter projected into space at the death of the stars. Dust was formed - literally stardust - on which ice and frozen carbon dioxide came to rest. When agglomerations of dust grew large enough to give birth to planets, the ice volatilized and escaped outside in the form of geysers. What's more, comets, which are made up largely of frozen water, fell on the planets, bringing water with them.

And the Earth retained that water?

Its field of gravity is strong enough to retain the water molecules on its surface, and its distance from the Sun allows it to retain water in liquid form, at least in part. In these early days of the Earth's formation, it was constantly bombarded by ultraviolet rays emitted by the young Sun.

The Gift of Water

Why didn't the same evolution take place on Venus?

We don't quite know. The two planets are so much alike they have virtually the same mass and contain the same amount of carbon. On Venus, however, this carbon is in the atmosphere, whereas on Earth, it is to a large extent in the ocean. Yet the atmospheric compositions of the two planets were very much alike in the early stages of their formation.



(Esta imagem publicada pela Nasa mostra como veríamos Vênus, com sua camada de espessas nuvens de dióxido de carbono. Por ser coberto com estas nuvens brancas, o planeta reflete muita luz do sol e se torna muito visível para nós. O brilho de Vênus nos faz confundir o planeta com uma estrela, que até ganhou o nome de Estrela Dalva.)



(Mas por debaixo das nuvens brancas, reina um planeta extremamente quente, como mostra esta imagem publicada pela Nasa como "Vênus desvelada".


What does the difference stem from?

We think that water in the liquid state on the surface of our planet played a crucial role. Thanks to this blanket of water, the carbon dioxide in Earth's early atmosphere was dissolved and wound up at the bottom of the oceans in the form of carbonates. Venus is slightly closer to the Sun than we are. The difference in temperature was in all likelihood responsible for the absence of liquid water in the planet's early stages. Its atmospheric envelope of carbon dioxide created an enormous greenhouse effect, which kept its surface temperature in the vicinity of five hundred dregrees. So it was that two planets, alike in many respects, evolved in two very different ways.

Without water - liquid water - it's safe to say that it would have been the end f our story.

I think so. Water played a primordial role in the appearance of cosmic complexity. Within the ocean blanket, sheltered from the ionizing rays from outer space, intense chemical reactions would occur. By means of various encounters and associations, those chemical reactions would produce molecular structures that were increasingly large. In the early stages of prebiotic evolution, carbon, born of the red giants, would play a major role.



(O nosso querido planeta Terra e seus lençóis de água.)


An Atmospheric Face

Why is carbon so successful?

It's the ideal atom for molecular constructions. It has what we call a valence of four, meaning that it has four electron "holes" that can act as harnesses for numerous other atoms. The links it creates are sufficiently supple to allow easy and quick association or disassociation, which is indispensable to life. Silicon also has a valence of four, but the links it makes are much more rigid. It creates stable structures, such as sand, but it has no capability to yield to the constrains of metabolism.

It's therefore absurd to imagine that somewhere out there in the universe there is life based on silicon.

It's highly unlikely. In our galaxy, as in the neighboring galaxies, the various molecules of more than four atoms that we've been able to identify by radio telescope always contain carbon, never silicon. This observation strongly suggests that if life does exist elsewhere in the universe, it is also made out of carbon.

Once Earth's atmosphere was formed, life soon followed, isn't that so?

When Earth was born roughly four and a half billion years ago, the conditions were scarcely favorable. The temperature on the surface was too high. In addition, at that time, space was rife with countless small celestial bodies that would later be absorbed by more massive planets (the solar system was cleaning up its own house). The constant bombardment of meteorites
and comets was extremely violent. Studies of various comets revealed the presence of a considerable quantity of hydrocarbons. The collisions of the first billion years in all likelihood brought, in addition to water, an important quantity of complex molecules to the surface of the Earth. These comets, which in ages past were generally thought to e harbingers of death and destruction, probably played a beneficial role in the appearance of life. Less than a billion years after the birth of Earth, its oceans were swarming with living organisms, including the first blue-green bacteria. This view was strongly confirmed by the rich harvest of organic molecules left behind in the tail of the comet Hale-Bopp in 1997, including formaldehyde, various cyanides, and methanol.

sexta-feira, 25 de junho de 2010

evolução e o carbono ainda nas estrelas

Hubert Reeves em Origins, Arcade Publishing, New York, 1998.

"The progress of astrophysics has enabled us to bring the questions to the forefront of contemporary thinkers but has not enabled us to provide satisfactory answers. All we can say is that, contrary to the universe, which is in constant flux, these laws of physics do not change, either in space or in time. In the context of the Big Bang theory, these laws have presided over the making of complexity. What is more, the properties of these laws are even more astonishing. Their algebraic formulas and their numerical values appear particularly well adjusted.

In what way they are "well adjusted"?

Our mathematical simulations prove it: if they had been even slightly different, the universe would never have emerged from its initial chaos. No complex structure would have emerged, not even a molecule of sugar.

Why?

Just imagine for a moment that the nuclear force had been slightly stronger. All the protons would have quickly gathered into heavy nuclei. There would have been no hydrogen left to assure the longevity of the Sun and to form water masses here on earth. Instead, the nuclear force was just intense enough to produce some heavy nuclei (including carbon and oxygen) but not so intense as to completely eliminate the hydrogen - just the right dose. One could even go so far as to say that complexity, life, and consciousness were implicit from the very first instants of the universe, that they were inscribed, so to speak, in the very form of the laws - not as being 'necessary', but as being a possibility.

p 42

"Our Sun has thus been 'fueled' by hydrogen for four and a half billion years. The more massive stars shine much more brightly and use up their hydrogen in a few million years, at which point they begin to contract again. Their temperature rises to more than 100 million degrees. Helium, the product of hydrogen fusion, in turn becomes a fuel, at which point a set of nuclear reactions allows for new combinations: three helium nuclei are going to come together as carbon nuclei, and four helium nuclei as oxygen nuclei.

But why didn't these reactions take place at the time of the original Big Bang?

The encounter and fusion of three helium nuclei is an extremely rare phenomenon. It takes a long time for it to occur. In the original Big Bang, the phase of nuclear activity lasted for only a few minutes, which is too short a time to manufacture a meaningful quantity of carbon. This time, in the more massive stars, the agglomerations are going to take place over millions of years.

Each of these more massive stars is therefore going to manufacture carbon and oxygen nuclei?

For the next several million years, the centers of the larger stars will indeed be stockpiled with heavy nuclei, including carbon and oxygen. These elements are going to play a fundamental role in the following phase of our history. Carbon in particular, with its special atomic configuration, lends itself easily to the manufacture of long molecular chains, which will play a key role in the appearance of life. Oxygen will become a component of water, another element that is indispensable to life."

p 54 - 55

Espirais (Via Láctea - Spiral Jetty)

"The atoms of our biosphere have necessarily been created in the crucible stars and are sent forth into space when the stars die. These intertwined generations of stars and atoms begin to take place hundred million years after the Big Bang and will go on for several billion years thereafter. Space becomes a kind of forest of stars: stars big and small, young and old, die, disintegrate, and enrich the terrain to nourish new growth.



In our galaxy alone, an average of three stars come into being every year. Thus it is that, relatively late in the game, roughly four and a half billion years ago, on star of particular interest to us, our Sun, is born on the fringe of a spiral galaxy, the Milky Way.

Why "spiral"?

It's the rapid rotation of the stars around its center that gives our galaxy its shape, which is that of a flattened disk. The origin of the spiral arms is a result of complex gravitational phenomena. The Milky Way, that great luminous arc that crosses the sky at night, is the image of all the stars strewn the length of the disk of the galaxy and revolving around its center: our solar system makes a complete revolution around that center roughly once every two hundred million years. "

Hubert Reeves em Origins, p 58-59, Arcade Publishing, New York, 1998.




imagens da Via Láctea publicadas pela Nasa.



imagem da via láctea pelo fotógrafo Larry Landolfi






A espiral de Robert Smithson: Spiral Jetty, Utah, 1970.

"Size determines an object, but scale determines art."

"For me scale operates by uncertainty. To be in the scale of the Spiral Jetty is to be out of it. On eye level, the tail leads one into an undifferentiated state of matter. One's downward gaze pitches form size to size, picking out random depositions of salt crystals on the inner and outer edges, while the entire mass echoes the irregular horizons. And each cubic salt crystal echoes the Spiral Jetty in terms of the crystal's molecular lattice. Growth in a crystal advances around a dislocation point, in the manner of a screw. The Spiral Jetty could be considered one layer within the spiraling crystal lattice, magnified trillions of times..."

Robert Smithson, The Spiral Jetty, 1972.



cristais de sal

errare humanum est





Tem uns dias
Que eu acordo
Pensando e querendo saber
De onde vem
O nosso impulso
De sondar o espaço
A começar pelas sombras sobre as estrelas
E de pensar que eram os deuses astronautas
E que se pode voar sozinho até as estrelas
Ou antes dos tempos conhecidos
Vieram os deuses de outras galáxias?
Ou de um planeta de possibilidades impossíveis?
E de pensar que não somos os primeiros seres terrestres
Pois nós herdamos uma herança cósmica
Errare humanum est
Errare humanum est
Nem deuses
Nem astronautas
Eram os deuses astronautas?
Errare humanum est
Errare humanum est

(jorge ben, 1974)



errar
er.rar
(lat errare) vtd 1 Cometer erro em: Errar a soma. vtd 2 Não acertar: Errar o passo, os traços. vti 3 Cometer erro, enganar-se em. vint 4 Cair em culpa: Não perdoa os que erram. vint 5 Não atingir o alvo: Seus tiros não erravam. vti e vint 6 Vagabundear, vaguear: Errava pelas praias. "Vaga-lumes erravam luciluzindo..." (Coelho Neto). vti 7 Flutuar: Um pesar lhe errava no semblante.


errar, vagar, migrar


segunda-feira, 14 de junho de 2010

Black Carbon - conversa com Prof. Heitor parte 4

relato da conversa com Prof. Heitor Evangelista (laboratório de Bio-física da UERJ) + pesquisas na internet.

Parte 4: Black Carbon

Black Carbon é uma formação de carbono produzida por uma combustão incompleta, em que a falta de oxigênio impede que a combustão ocorra até o fim. Chamamos de fuligem à massa de vapor preto que emerge de uma combustão (queimada, fogueira, etc). Toda a fumaça preta contém o chamado black carbon.
Esta fuligem negra sobe para a atmosfera para mais tarde se precipitar e se fixar em algum lugar.

"Black carbon "is a product of incomplete combustion especially of coal, diesel fuels" and biomass fuels, according to NASA. Without enough oxygen and at low temperatures, the carbon does not fully oxidize, creating black carbon."

http://media.www.jhunewsletter.com/media/storage/paper932/news/2003/10/31/Science/Jhu-Student.Studies.Black.Carbon-2245810.shtml

Segundo o Prof. Heitor, o black carbon produzido na América do Sul é transportado por correntes de vento até a Antártica. Lá ele se fixa no gelo e é um dos motivos para o degelamento. O gelo branco reflete grande parte da radiação solar, mas as manchas negras do black carbon absorvem a radiação e contribuem no derretimento das geleiras. Isto é um grande risco para o aquecimento global pois a água absorve muito mais a radiação solar do que o gelo, então após o derretimento das calotas polares, os oceanos além de aumentarem de volume irão absorver mais calor. E os oceanos quentes têm menos biodiversidade do que os oceanos frios.




Imagens do black carbon subindo pelos ares na recente erupção do vulcão na Islândia.

*

Para minha grande surpresa, tamanha sincronia e consequente certeza do caminho a seguir:

O Black carbon é a matéria prima da tinta preta chamada nanquim. O nanquim é feito com a fuligem negra que resulta da queima de óleos vegetais. Com uma pequena tampa sobre a chama coleta-se a fuligem, que depois é misturada com uma cera, até secar e tomar o seu formato tradicional de barra.

Sem me dar conta, enquando filmava uma fábrica de nanquim em Nara (Japão) para o meu trabalho SUMI (nanquim em japonês), estava me deparando com o Black Carbon. Toda a experimentação da escrita com nanquim na água é uma observação da matéria-carbono em dissolução. Desta aproximação deslumbrada com o nanquim, parto agora para uma análise mais profunda de sua matéria principal: o carbono.



domingo, 13 de junho de 2010

de volta ao Carbono - conversa com Prof. Heitor parte 3

Conversa com o Prof. Heitor Evangelista (laboratório de Bio-física da UERJ)

Parte 3

O Carbono-14 é um isótopo instável (radioativo). Sua meia-vida é de aproximadamente 5730 anos. O que faz o carbono-14 ser tão importante para a ciência é que na formação das cadeias químicas ele não se diferencia dos outros carbonos (carbono-12 e carbono-13). Isto significa que o carbono-14 é processado como os outros carbonos; ele é fixado em compostos orgânicos e inorgânicos e funciona como um marcador do tempo.

O carbono-14 talvez seja o elemento mais comum nos procedimentos de medição do tempo pois ele é muito abundante. Porém, em alguns casos outros elementos radioativos são mais indicados, como por exemplo quando precisa-se medir tempos muito longos (milhões/bilhões de anos). Em rochas carboníferas (como por exemplo o calcário), a presença quase predominante dp carbono atrapalha as medições com o carbono-14, e outro elemento radioativo deverá ser usado.

O Prof. Heitor Evangelista faz medições das camadas de solos para avaliar as características climáticas de cada época. Sua pesquisa engloba a medição das camadas de gelo da Antártica e dos solos da Amazônia.

Na Antártica, ele descobriu que estará também análisando as características climáticas da América do Sul, já que correntes de vento levam os resíduos da América do Sul para lá.

sábado, 12 de junho de 2010

Walter De Maria

On the Importance of Natural Disasters (1960)

I think natural disasters have been looked upon in the wrong way.
Newspapers always say they are bad, a shame.
I like natural disasters and I think that they may be the highest form of art possible to experience.
For one thing they are impersonal.
I don't think art can stand up to nature.
Put the best object you know next to the grand canyon, niagara falls, the red woods.
The big things always win.
Now just think of a flood, forest fire, tornado, earthquake, Typhoon, sand storm.
Think of the breaking of the Ice jams. Crunch.
If all of the people who go to museums could just feel an earthquake.
Not to mention the sky and the ocean.
But it is in the unpredictable disasters that the highest forms are realized.
They are rare and we should be thankful for them.




Lightning Field, 1971-77



Mile Long Drawing, 1968

Theories and Documents of Contemporary Art - org. Kristine Stiles and Peter Selz, University of California Press, California, 1996.